I Told You So

Envelope
Image credit: Photo by
Pink Sherbet Photography on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

"I bet anything she's pregnant," said Mark as we left a get together with friends in the years long before recovery.  Having been through a pregnancy recently ourselves at that point, we knew what to look for: the change in eating habits, the hand unconsciously and lovingly resting over a still flat stomach...

"Totally," I agreed, "But they must not be telling people the news yet."

"You remember that time they said that they didn't think it was possible to tell when someone was at the beginning of a pregnancy?"

"And we did think it was!  Oh, I do!  I really want to tell them 'I told you so,' but we ought to let them share the news in their own time.  But if we do wait, they'll never believe we knew."

"We ought to write it down!  Then we can prove that we knew."

"I know what we should do!  We'll write it down and seal it in an envelope and mail it to ourselves.  That way it will have the postmark with the date on it.  I've heard people do that as a cheap and easy way to copyright their writing."

Mark agreed that this was the most fantastic and foolproof idea he'd ever heard.  So, we being the not-so-mature or spiritually enlightened, but at least very clever, individuals we were, did just that.  And after our friends finally shared their good news with us, we were able to produce the envelope with a flourish and seal our reputations, both as greatly insightful predictors of pregnancy and as gigantic dorks.  Whatever.  The important thing was: we were right!

And we made them laugh, which was a relief, because it doesn't always happen that way.  Needing to be right can be seriously annoying.  It's a big glaring character defect of mine, and like most of my character defects, it's born of fear: the fear that I don't know what's real, that I can't trust myself or my own perceptions.  External validation is the rock on which I build my church to the fickle God of other people's opinions.

Over the years, in so many of my relationships, I haven't been able to hold on to my truth.  I'd state what I saw and be told I didn't see it, state what I felt to be told I didn't feel it, and I'd begin to doubt my own eyes and my own heart.  If you say the sky is blue and everyone else around you says it's red, how long before you get your eyes checked?  How long before you begin to wonder if you actually know what blue looks like?  How long before you start to call it red too?  And when someone whispers to you, "No, it is blue, and I have proof..."  That's when the "I was right and I have proof" victory dance begins.  The one that seems inexplicable to the pleasantly surprised and bemused pregnant woman you're confronting with an irrefutable postmarked envelope.

3 comments

Golden Years

ElderlyGardener
Image credit: Photo by
Travis Jon Allison on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

"I don't like Agnes much," said my mother, "She's definitely no Aunt Gerty.  But it's because Gerty was so wonderful that I think Uncle Fred is marrying Agnes."

"What do you mean?" I asked.  Uncle Fred and Aunt Gerty had been married over fifty years when Gerty died.  I was in my early teens at the time and had always figured that the sign of a truly happy marriage was keeping that space in heart and home forever sacred, and never marrying again once you'd lost that one true love.  So it had seemed strange to me that, after a year or so of seeming lost in grief, Uncle Fred had started dating with so much enthusiasm.  He was over eighty and had a social life more active than mine.

"Well, Uncle Fred and Aunt Gerty loved each other a lot, but he not only misses her, he misses being married. He's had such good times being married, and he's used to living life with a partner. But then look at John, next door; he and Martha had a hard time. It's been years since she passed away, and he doesn't even have the slightest interest in dating.  I'm sure he doesn't want to go through that again."

Our elderly neighbor John seemed to love and care about his wife Martha, but her mental illness colored everything. She was depressed, addicted to prescription medications and could have been (if she had lived in today's reality TV world) featured on Hoarders. When she died, I assumed that John, a great, spunky man with a quick smile and a zest for life, would finally have the chance to find a partner who could make him happy.  But I'd been baffled to find that he preferred to spend his time alone, tending to his garden.  Maybe my mother was right: with no experience of marriage as happy, John had no incentive to get into a new relationship.

I find myself thinking of John from time to time, because (I know, never say never) I can't picture myself ever wanting to get into a romantic relationship again.  I'm happy in my marriage as it is now, but I can't imagine starting this all over again with someone new.  It's too dang much work.  And I have no illusions that the next time, if I somehow pick the "right guy" (you know, not a crazy sex addict), the journey would be an effortless dance on a carpet of rose petals rather than, well, more hard work.  It's similar to the way I love my kids and have found parenting rewarding beyond belief, but I have no desire to adopt more newborns when my children are grown.  (I don't even get nostalgic for that newborn scent and downy hair, because I know all too well it comes with dirty diapers and sleepless nights.)  If I lose Mark before he loses me, I fully plan to spend my golden years, ensconced in a house full of beautifully fragile and child unfriendly things, in happy retirement from both romantic relationships and young children.

But what if things happen the other way around?  I had a cancer scare recently, and while I was waiting for the biopsy results, I wavered between faith and fear.  I was firmly on the faith side for several days, knowing that whatever happened (whether it was, from my perspective, good or bad), I would be where I should be and I would be supported, loved and able to cope.  But thoughts of my own mortality would creep in, especially as time went on, and while I valiantly pushed out thoughts of what my kids would do should the absolute worst case be true (there was no way I was going there), I did find myself wondering which path my husband, still just in his forties, would choose.  And I found myself fighting back tears as I drove to an appointment, because I couldn't imagine Mark being alone and that thought hurt deeply and scared me as much as almost anything else.

Before the disclosure of sex addiction, I used to be comforted by the thought that, if I died, a remarriage would be, like it was for my Uncle Fred, a way of honoring the happiness we have and of finding (hopefully) a new loving partner to be there for the kids.  Besides, as Mark always says, "I don't care what you do after I'm dead.  I'll be dead, so I won't know the difference."  But now I found it brought up, not just echoes of abandonment and betrayal, but illusions of my own power and fears of the addiction surfacing anew in my absence.  I could hear the whisper in my mind, "I have to live, because if I'm gone, there's nothing to keep him from diving right back into insanity."  And that's the sound of me diving back into my insanity.

When my doctor called to tell me that all was well, it was a relief to know that my physical body is sound, but it was also a relief to know I have time to deal with those little demons in my mind that tell me that I'd be better at picking Mark's path than he would and that I'm the only thing standing between my family and disaster.  That kind of pressure is exhausting.  No wonder John's post-Martha puttering in the garden looks so attractive to me!

7 comments

Tiger Woods: Destination Unknown

DestinationUnknown
Image credit: Photo by
Misserion on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

I finally got around to watching the Tiger Woods apology speech, and I have to admit, I was impressed.  As a New York Times article pointed out, even without explicitly saying the words "sex addiction" or "12 Step" the speech clearly implied both. In a way it was like a public 9th Step, even including the word "amends."  Although I found it heartbreaking that he was in a position to have to 9th Step the world so soon, I thought he did a surprisingly good job for someone who has only just started this process. He took responsibility for his actions and it was clear that he's been doing some work.  It seemed like an excellent start to a journey of recovery.

However, I know perfectly well that does not mean the journey is going to end in a particular destination.  He may go right back into his old behaviors. His marriage may end.  His career may end.  Or his acting out may stop.  And his marriage may end anyway.  Or his marriage my thrive. Or the whole thing may be a playacting sham.  Which may continue.  Or not continue.

But having been through my own smaller private version of the Tiger Woods story, and having heard countless others, I know that where it ends -- in marriage success or failure, in career success or failure -- doesn't tell me anything about what kind of person Tiger Woods is.  Or what kind of person his wife is.  Or whether or not he is, at this moment, sincere in his desire for change.  Or whether or not recovery programs work in treating other people like him.  Yet, unfortunately, all of those are and will be the object of speculation around water coolers and in news columns and on blog posts.

I can only say that I wish Tiger and Elin Woods and their family the very best in their journey, whatever the destination.

6 comments

Set Apart

Pawn
Image credit: Photo by
timabbott on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

A recent NY Times opinion piece on toxins and autism has been making the rounds lately, and well, frankly, the piece bugs the crap out of me, and I can't quite figure out why. After all, it seems like, not just an excellent idea, but a complete no-brainer to want to ensure that that the products we use -- that go into our air and water and foods and bodies -- are safe and non-toxic. And it seems reasonable to be concerned, given the thousands of untested chemicals in use every day, about possible links to our health: from the way they affect our organs and tissues to the way they affect our neurological processes. And it seems reasonable to me to want to investigate what autism is and what causes it. And yet...

Maybe it's the fact that the first few paragraphs contain the words "frighteningly common" and "financial and human cost" and "burden." Words matter. And those words, rather than including my son Austen and others like him in the human family, set him apart, as a burden and a cost that the rest of us have to shoulder.

Maybe it's the focus on autism in particular. If the concern is truly about the effect of toxins on our health, why call out autism rather than talking about either cancers or neurological issues generally (both of which were mentioned almost in passing)? Instead, autism is set apart.  Autism is chosen to be the poster child for neurological issues; autism is the frightening specter from which we all must run; autism is the enemy; autism is the pawn in this political game.

Maybe it's that several paragraphs are spent on what pregnant women ought to be doing and only one sentence is spent on the mention that often, at least in the one quarter of autism cases that are genetic, there is nothing a pregnant woman could be doing differently at all. Maybe it's because I can already hear the same voices -- the ones who told me that the "costs" and "burden" of Austen being autistic were my own doing, because I vaccinated him, because I let him watch TV, because I had him when I was over the age of 30 -- now telling moms this is their fault for using the wrong shampoo or for painting their nails, when that may not be the case at all.  The factors are so complex and difficult to tease out that we simply do not know right now, and may never know.

Maybe it's that all of those things leave me feeling that autism is set apart, that my son and my family are set apart, that we are (and have brought on others) a burden and a problem to be eliminated, rather than being an integral part of a situation we all need to work through together.

3 comments

God in 100 Words or Fewer

GodDay
Image credit: Photo by
WTL photos on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

Over at Patheos, a few bloggers were asked to describe God in 100 words or "less" (It should be "fewer," but does God want me to nitpick about grammar in this case?  I don't know.  So I'm passive-aggressively nitpicking, just a little.) and some readers have joined in. I liked the idea and have decided to leave my own offering here. 

I do it somewhat guiltily, because as long as I've known and loved my blogger friend Velvet Verbosity, I've never actually participated in one of her 100 Word Challenges, and yet here I am participating in someone else's. In my defense, I didn't get creative with this, I merely edited down a previous post to see if I could capture my God in a word nutshell. Turns out, I can. Now if I could get this down to one clever sentence...

My God is:
An idea.
Love, beauty, kindness, compassion, truth.
Evolution; physics; the scientific method.
The Buddhist truth of impermanence and science's first law of thermodynamics (which states energy can neither be created nor destroyed): everything changes, yet continues in some new form.
The energy of life: the heart beating, the neurons firing, the breath.
The connection between all living things.
Starlight, bones and dog-earred pages.
The dark, astonishing part of me that my best words (and the best of me) come out of.
In everything, yet not fully in anything.
Always in these words and never in these words.

8 comments

A Sketch of Denial

Girl
Image credit: Photo by
chandrika221 on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

There are certain moments in my life that I come back to, over and over, the way Monet came back to his waterlilies: trying to capture the way they look at just this moment, from just this perspective, in just this light. The moment I discovered my husband's addiction is one of those. I run the brush of my words over it again and again, painting it from a thousand different angles: the break between what I thought I knew and what I came to know.

I try to think of how I might explain it to someone who has never been there, how I might have explained it to the person I used to be, but it's always like saying, "Imagine you don't know everything you know" or "Imagine you know something that you don't know."  Imagine you don't know your hand is attached to your body or you don't understand that what goes up must come down.  Imagine what it's like to live on a planet that hasn't been discovered yet, whose climate and lifeforms and place in the universe we don't know.

I hear people refer to the place I came from -- the place I call the Matrix -- as "denial," and that single word seems so inadequate and misleading.  Listen to the water cooler conversations or read the tweets or listen to the callers on the radio shows, and you will hear women like me discussed: Hillary Clinton, Gayle Haggard, Silda Spitzer, Jenny Sanford, Elin Woods... "Come on, she must have known. What did she think was going on? She was in denial!" As if they all knew exactly what was going on, but chose to politely look away.  And maybe they did.  Maybe in some versions of the Matrix story, Neo is told he's living in a pod, but doesn't want to believe it.

But I was a child at a magic show.   I believed that I understood how the world worked and what the reasons were for what I saw: magic!  I believed the smoke and mirrors were real, believed the rabbit appeared out of thin air, believed it was possible to saw someone in half and put her back together again.  You can imagine what happens when one tries such things.  Tonight's canvas of Denial does not portray a woman pretending not to see the card she knows is up the sleeve, but a woman, dazed and baffled, holding a bloody saw over the person she cannot put back together again.

16 comments

Impatient Haiku

Haiku FridayPraying for patience.
Praying... Waiting... Stupid God!
I want patience now!

7 comments

World of Illusion

Magic
Image credit: Photo by
kippbakr on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

"Whoa!  How did he do that?!" my kids exclaimed as the magician we were watching lifted a cup to reveal that a small red rubber ball had been magically transformed into a bright yellow tennis ball.

My son Austen thought a moment and then exclaimed, "I know how he did it!"

"Uh, oh," I thought, "Austen is about to commit the ultimate magic faux pas and reveal the way the magician does his trick."  After all, I'd seen the magician's hand go to his pocket some time back and while his hands were so extremely deft and quick that I hadn't actually been able to see the transfer of balls, I knew it had happened.

I'd learned to watch magicians carefully as a child after painstakingly saving my allowance money to buy a magic kit that claimed to transform pennies into dollars.  At the time, it seemed like a wise and excellent investment.  With this kit, I'd be able to transform future allowance earnings into one hundred times their original worth with a flick of my hand over this magic black box.  I'd be able to buy whatever I wanted.  I'd be set for life.

What a disappointment to find that the kit contained a box with a trick compartment.  Insert a dollar into the false back of the box, put a penny in the front, close the box and reopen the trick compartment to reveal the hidden dollar.  Ta da!  As magician Doug Henning used to say, "Magic is illusion!"

But it turned out Austen hadn't seen illusion yet, only magic.  "It was his magic wand!" he blurted out, "That's how he did it!"  And as he said it, I felt an odd mixture of tenderness and disappointment.  His world view wasn't sophisticated enough yet to recognize that there were other possibilities, and there was something adorable and poignant and heartbreaking in that all at once.

4 comments

Warning Signs

Pattern
Image credit: Photo by
kaladan on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

I went for a checkup recently, and as I waited for the doctor, I read some of the brochures in the office about heart disease, diabetes, cancer... And found that in nearly every brochure, one of the symptoms listed for cancer was "no symptoms or vague symptoms."

I have two friends who have been diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer. They have sent out their stories along with lists of warning signs: things they now see clearly, things they think they should have caught, little things that now loom big, the vague symptoms that came only near the time they were diagnosed. And it's easy for me to look at those lists and think, "Oh, I would definitely have gotten that checked out right away. It seems really obvious there was something wrong." Yep, I'd be safe from cancer. I'd notice.

Of course, when I weave together the story of my life with my husband, the hidden addiction seems obvious: like a single red thread winding its way through white cloth. Just as it is for my friends who have cancer, it's easy to see things in retrospect, to look over that list of warning signs of infidelity or sex addiction in a trashy magazine and say, "Yes, that was there and that was too." It's easy to feel foolish, to think the pattern was there, perfectly visible, for anyone to see. It's easy to believe that I know what to look for even now. But it's the narrative that makes it appear that way.

It's impossible to truly tell my story the way I saw it at the time. In a single day, there are 24 hours; there are 1440 minutes; there are 86,400 seconds. In a year there are nearly 9 thousand hours; there are over half a million minutes; and there are over 31 million seconds. In the period of a little over nine years that my husband and I lived together — sharing the same house, the same phone, the same computer, the same bank account, the same credit cards — there were over 3 thousand days; around 80 thousand hours; nearly 5 million minutes; nearly 300 million seconds.  And that's not even getting to the years we knew each other, loved each other, were intimate with each other before we lived together.

Days, weeks, months, sometimes even years, would go by without any indication that anything was wrong. Then there would be silence again, before another little blip on the radar.  I thought the pattern was what happened most often; it took a long time to see that the breaks in the pattern were themselves a pattern, although now, when I write, when I remember, it seems obvious.  I condense the story down, I write out the old pattern, the one that seemed predominant, because I can't remember every single one of those intervening ordinary moments, and certainly no one would want to read them even if I could.

They'd be a very long version of something like this: Mark woke up and kissed me. He showered, humming happily, while I lay in bed listening to the water run before I got up.  He got dressed. I got dressed. We said we loved each other. We chatted about the day ahead. We went to work. He walked out the door for work at exactly the same time every day. A minute later he walked back in the door because he'd forgotten his wallet or his keys or some paper he needed. We called each other during the day just to say "hi" or "I love you" or "I'm on my way home now." He'd come home on time every day, and he'd always call me before he left work to ask what we were doing for dinner or if he should pick anything up from the store on the way home or if I would. We'd have dinner. We'd chat about our day and our work and our coworkers. We'd watch TV. We'd laugh. We'd kiss. We'd say, "I love you." We'd go to bed, together.

Repeat every day for hundreds of days.

He'd be a few hours late for just one day.  One day.  Out of thousands.

Weeks would go by.

He'd stay up late on the computer one night and then it would be back to our normal pattern.  A few hours.  Out of tens of thousands.

A month would go by.

He'd mention a new friend.  A few seconds.  Out of hundreds of millions of seconds.

Several more months would go by.

He'd call her.  A few minutes.  Out of millions of minutes.

Years would go by. During which I'd never hear about the friend again.

He'd stay up late on the computer for a few nights.  Another small blip in the thousands of nights we'd spent together where he wasn't on the computer.

Hundreds more days would go by...

Just as cancer in its later stages produces more (and more severe) symptoms, when Mark's addiction escalated, the time between incidents shortened and the pattern became more evident.  But when he disclosed the full extent of his actions during addiction, there truly were encounters (particularly early on) that I knew nothing about and would never have known about or suspected if he hadn't told me.  There were no odd receipts, no phone calls, no travel, no late nights at work, no strange withdrawals from the bank account, no unusual smells or actions.  They were one time incidents that happened while I was out of town on business or he was out of town on business or I was working (or working late). There was no way to feel those first few cancer cells growing.  There was no way to feel the impact of a tumor smaller than a pin's head.  The aberration wasn't big enough to be recognized yet.

And I realized that I can't be safe from cancer or sex addiction or anything else, even if I know the warning signs.  Sometimes there simply are no symptoms or only vague symptoms.  Until the end.

17 comments

Help! Bill Gates Is Coming!

DigitalFuture
Image credit: Photo by
Stuck in Customs on Flickr
Licensed under Creative Commons

Periodically, news stories send me into a panic. Do I need to order a truck load of face masks before that flu pandemic hits? Is that TSA security person going to have to strip search me now that some guy tried to smuggle explosives on a plane in his underwear? Would Jennifer Aniston seriously get back together with Brad Pitt (especially with that beard!) as some tabloid's Photoshopped picture of the two of them implies? But my panic du jour is over Bill Gates.

Consider this: a New York Times article about the Gates Foundation's plans to double spending on vaccines.  Sure, it seems harmless enough.  In fact, my first thought on reading this article was: "Bill Gates rocks.  This is going to help so many children.  I wish every billionaire did as much.  I almost want to go buy some Microsoft products now.  Almost, but not quite.  I'd still rather get an iPad."

But my second thought was, "Crap.  Conspiracy theorists are going to eat this up."

You see, many people speculate that a link exists between vaccines and autism.  I personally reject the notion that vaccines played any role in my own son's autism, but I do know people who feel this is true for their children and I can understand that.  But a true conspiracy theorist will take it further than their own personal experience.  I've heard speculation that vaccines are of no benefit at all, only harm.  Some even claim that vaccines weren't responsible for eradicating smallpox.  (Did you know that supposed triumph of medical science was simply due to improvements in hygiene?  Although, mysteriously, this was true even in poverty stricken countries that still suffer from poor hygiene, as well as a host of other diseases for which there was no vaccination program. Hm...)

So, Bill Gates (if we're playing in conspiracy theory territory) wants to give some children autism and kill the rest off with poisonous vaccines.  But why?  That's easy.  The general answer to why is always: world domination!  But if you want to talk specifics, all you have to do is consider the fact that it has been widely speculated that Bill Gates is himself autistic.

Yes, I see you out there nodding your heads.  (Because I'm watching you through the little cameras in your computers.  I am.  Don't believe me?  You look like you're about to yawn, in spite of the fact that you're reading something as fascinating as this.  Yep, you look like you want to yawn, yawn, yawn.  You look so tired, like you're just going to stretch your mouth wide open and let out the biggest yawn in the whole yawning... Ha!  You did.  I told you I was watching.)

So, you see where this is going: Bill Gates, presumably autistic, is going to make vaccines, which some think cause autism, available to millions more children worldwide.  Don't you see it?  He is building a vast autistic army for world domination!

Well, I for one, am ready for the New World Order.  Having witnessed the things that bug my son, I'm pretty sure I know how to send Bill Gates' army screaming away.  But I'm not telling.  I, for one, am planning to welcome our new autistic overlords instead, because well, I don't think the world could be worse off than it is with Bill Gates in charge, and at least we won't contract polio or die of measles.

6 comments